First Ward Projects, Street Repairs and More

I hope that you’re enjoying this unseasonably warm February day. As always, I wanted to quickly reach out to you to update you on items of importance to Hoboken that you might find of interest.

MARIJUANA IN HOBOKEN

With the recreational cannabis law still in flux in Trenton, the City Council tabled an ordinance to permit recreational marijuana in Hoboken until the law, and its impacts on local municipalities, has been made clear.  Instead, the City Council re-centered the conversation on medicinal marijuana, and voted in favor of a new law to permit medicinal dispensaries, once licensed by the State. There are many strong arguments to legalize, from ending the often unfair impact drug arrests have on African American and Hispanic residents to the economic development and tax revenue possibilities. But no matter what happens at the state level, we need to make sure we have appropriate safeguards in place here in Hoboken to make sure that any potential marijuana businesses operate safely and in a way that enhances our city, instead of threatening our neighborhoods.

Though I am a proponent of medical dispensaries, I voted “no” on the first law as it was a rushed attempt to simply say we did it without considering unintended consequences.   The law as initially passed would almost entirely impact downtown Hoboken without any guarantee that the neighborhood impact would benefit from the added revenues. Further, full control over licensing would be given to the mayor, without any City Council input.  

As Chair of the Zoning Committee, I worked with my Council colleagues and the administration to craft a better medicinal-cannabis ordinance.  The updated law gives more oversight to the Council on licensing applications, as well as creating a “cannabis improvement district” which aims to provide more resources, like street improvements and additional enforcement, to the neighbors directly impacted by a dispensary.  I will be introducing these corresponding amendments at tomorrow’s City Council meeting, with a final reading of the revised law occurring on February 20th

marijuana feb.jpg

To aid dialogue, I am pleased to host a community meeting this Thursday February 7th at Antique Loft (33 River Street) from 7-8pm.

This open forum will be a community discussion on medicinal marijuana, the updates to the local ordinance, as well as the prospects of recreational dispensaries. I will be joined by a panel of medical experts and doctors based in Northern NJ, industry experts, in addition to former Pueblo County Commissioner Sal Pace of Colorado. Please join me Thursday for the conversation!

MONARCH DEVELOPMENT

The Monarch is a proposed residential real estate project on the former piers in front of the Hudson Tea Building, roughly between 14th and 15th Streets. As you may be aware, the City has been in a six-year lawsuit with the developer but in January, lost another appeal to stop the development from impacting our waterfront. The recent Appellate Court ruling pointed to a 2017 Court ruling also in favor of the developer, which stated Hoboken’s retroactive flood ordinance, passed after the planning board failed to hear the Monarch development, is not valid.
Indeed, there is no more appropriate description of the circumstances leading to this unfortunate outcome than by the Appellate Court Judge himself, "If there is a lesson to be learned from this case, it is the rule of law is paramount and cannot be sidestepped to avoid deciding unpopular land use applications." In practical terms this means that the City used a million taxpayer dollars fighting a case in court that the judge said should have been resolved by the City, as required by state law.

Specifically, the Hoboken Planning Board should have heard the application during the statutorily mandated period - at which time they could have voted it down - but they chose not to.  The belief of the Planning Board, whose members are appointed by the mayor, that litigation rather than established procedure was the best course of action which caused the project to be automatically approved, spurring six years of uphill legal battles.  The City Council is working with the administration to potentially relocate the project to other locations in town in hopes of preserving our waterfront. One of the leading sites to relocate the project’s bulk is the City’s public works garage on Observer between Park and Willow, squarely in my home district, the First Ward.  I wish this scenario could have been avoided, however at this point due to the failures of two mayoral administrations it appears to be one of our only options. 

As First Ward Councilman and much as I did with the Hilton Hotel project, I will push to ensure that any new development at the DPW site comes with community benefits for my neighborhood such as infrastructure and flooding improvements, the development of a downtown arts district, increased enforcement of nuisance ordinances and enhanced police presence. If Downtown Hoboken is going to be used to clean up this problem, we must receive commensurate community benefits to protect our quality of life.

Proposed rendering of the Monarch Development

Proposed rendering of the Monarch Development

FIXING OUR STREETS

Washington Street - With winter fully upon us, you may have noticed that the Washington Street contractors have stopped major roadwork on account of asphalt.    The project is now over $3 million over budget, stemming from mismanagement, however the good news is that once work resumes, it should be completed by Memorial Day.   I know this process has been a source of frustration since construction began two years ago and we’ve sadly seen the closure of some long time businesses on account of the delays.  However, as the Chairman of the Transportation Committee back in 2016, I was proud to support the long overdue-funding for our city's main street and am even prouder today to see the plan almost completed.  

Newark Street - In February 2017, the City conceived for and the Council funded a multi-modal transportation plan for cars, pedestrians and cyclists along Newark Street.  Shortly after the approvals, the State awarded Hoboken a $400,000 grant for the project and over the last two years the City has been working with Hudson County and State DOT to fulfill the necessary requirements to fund the project. Bureaucracy surrounding grant allocations is always high, but I have stayed on top of the situation and just yesterday, the City submitted final revisions and Hudson County has offered assistance in securing final approvals. Construction should commence this summer.  

streets feb.jpg

First Street
Paving will start in the spring - a county financed job, so I thank Hudson County Executive Degise and his team for getting it done.
 
Paterson Plank Road
In 2016 I was proud to work with my colleague Councilman Ramos in advancing a long-overdue southwest traffic study, which resulted in major new traffic patterns, including returning Jackson Street to two-lanes of traffic, as well as the installation of three new traffic signals.  The final recommendation from that study was to turn Patterson Plan Road into a one-way thoroughfare leaving Hoboken, to reduce traffic backup near the light rail. However, due to concerns from Jersey City, this unfortunately never moved forward.   At tomorrow’s Council meeting, myself and Councilman Ramos are again advocating for this traffic pattern and have authored a resolution urging Hudson County to stand with Hoboken on this important matter. 

Court Street & Castle Point Historic Rehabilitation - Since taking my seat on the Council, I have long-advocated for the historic protection and rehabilitation of Court Street, our City’s oldest cobblestone lane.  After necessary upgrades to the sidewalks abutting the street last summer, the Council allocated funding for an engineering study which yielded a plan for not only the potential renovation of Court Street, but also Castle Point Terrace, as well.  These are two of the city's most historic streets and currently many of the 19th century stone setts (aka - cobblestones) on Court Street, as well as the iconic yellow bricks along Castle Point, are missing, broken or paved over creating safety hazards and blight.   It's long overdue that we protect Hoboken's past, as we move rapidly towards our future and I couldn't be prouder of the collaborative work done between the city's engineering team and City Council to help make these projects feasible.  To partly fund construction, I authored two resolutions which were unanimously approved authorizing the city to apply for a $500,000 Hudson County Historic Preservation Grant.  Please sign the petition below urging the County to approved our grant requests and preserve our City's history! 

CITY-WIDE PARKING RATE INCREASE

I have long said that any rise in parking prices needs to come with an immediate investment from the City to help motorists, cyclists and pedestrians get around town more easily and more safely.   Modernizing our crumbling parking structures, using technology to ease the parking crunch and paving our streets are basic city services that should be covered without having to raise rates.   After all, the Parking Authority already operates with a $4.1 mm surplus, so any increases in my opinion are simply backdoor taxes, intended to fill budget gaps.

parking feb.jpg

Late last year, the mayor’s asked the Council to raise parking garage prices up to 32% as well as meter pricing up to 260%. Though I am proud to have voted against both of these laws, demanding more for residents before we passed costs along to them, the Council still split 5-4 in favor of the administration’s policies. However, after significant community pushback, the mayor has changed course and joined me in recognizing his push to raise prices was a mistake. In response to feedback, the Council and mayor have agreed to compromise legislation which will delay the increase for existing garage permit holders, by three years. All new garage applicants will unfortunately have to pay the new, higher, rate and the meter increases remain in place.

Finally, in my ongoing push to make parking fairer for residents, at tomorrow’s City Council meeting, we have a final vote on a law I've authored which will allow residents to park overnight from 6pm - 8am for $5. If passed, this would take cars off the street and make it easier for working residents to find parking after a busy workday.

WATER MAINS AND CONTRACT

How could we forget last summer, where there seemed to be a water main break every day? Well, we're close to a solution...

During the summer of 2017, you may recall that the previous mayoral administration hid nearly $10 million in un-budgeted debt to our water provider, Suez Water, who was conveniently a client of Mayor Bhalla’s law firm at the time. The City Council was then asked to vote on a poorly negotiated water contract, clearing out the debt but failing to provide a suitable solution for future water main repair and replacement. With then-Councilman Bhalla recused from the discussions due to potential business conflicts, the Council voted the contract down with the intent of returning to the negotiating table and getting a better long-term deal.

At the time, City Council members were not been privy to negotiations between the administrations and the water provider, but that has since changed. Over the last six months the infrastructure committee, expertly led by my colleague Councilwoman Tiffanie Fisher, has been working directly with Suez to negotiate a considerably better deal than the one that the Council was asked to vote on in 2017. I am glad that calmer heads prevailed and the mayor’s rush to litigate, a course that would have only benefited attorneys, not residents, failed to take root.

More details regarding the proposed new contract will be coming out over the course of the next few weeks and months, but know that I feel good with where we are. Stay tuned.

water feb.jpg

LOOKING AHEAD

As I enter the final year of my current term, I am energized and excited as always to continue representing you, bringing new energy and new ideas to Hoboken. Though politics seemed to lead headlines in 2018, I am particularly proud of the collaborative work the Council has done at working with the mayor despite the fact that we do not see eye to eye politically. As always, I look forward to working with anyone and everyone to develop and approve policy that’s good for Hoboken, but will never shy away from standing up for honest government or innovative ideas that shake the political status quo.

The movement we started together was always about good rational ideas, challenging the status quo and elevating collaboration and communication over politics. In 2017, we almost succeeded at bringing the change Hoboken needed, but just because we fell a few hundred votes short of winning the mayor's office, doesn't mean we stop. What's unfortunate about politics today is that young people have never been more inspired to get involved, but don't know how to and all the while face uphill battles against status quo politicians. We can change that, but I need your help.

Bring Fair Elections To Hoboken -- Vote YES on November 6th for Runoff Elections

This Election Day Hoboken voters have a question to vote on that could shape our city’s future -- whether we should use runoff elections if a candidate for Mayor or City Council doesn’t win a majority of votes. The answer is, YES! Runoffs are used in most every similar NJ municipality and require a candidate to earn 50% of the vote to win office. Hoboken doesn't though, and as a result are the only city in the state that has a Mayor elected with less than 50 percent of the vote. You might recall last year's crowded and confusing mayoral race, where we had six people running with 68 percent of residents voting against the candidate who won.   

It’s not really democracy if your vote doesn’t count.

Establishment politicians and special interests know this and use this broken system to divide our community and then pander to those smaller voting blocks, and win. Runoff elections would require candidates to create broader platforms and once elected, broader policies, which benefit the most number of residents as possible, not just the select few who elected them. Your support on this question would mean every vote counts -- making it harder for candidates to intentionally divide the community for political gain in future elections.  

The question will be at the bottom of the ballot and I really hope you will support and spread the word to see fair elections in Hoboken!

In just 60 seconds watch why runoffs are important to democracy and fair elections in Hoboken


Why Runoffs are Important?

Just last November, Hoboken had 6 candidates running for mayor and 14 running for City Council to fill 3 seats -- a political circus that confused and frustrated many voters. In response to residents concerns, an overwhelming majority (7-2) of the City Council approved a ballot referendum which would allow our community to collectively decide whether or not to re-institute runoff elections. Mayor Bhalla vetoed the ordinance, spreading half-truths and politicizing the issue, but the Council responded by overriding him (7-2) to let the people decide (click here to read the NJ.com article).  

Without runoff elections, true independent candidates face an uphill battle and a nearly impossible task to run for office without institutional support as crowded races favor the person who can raise the most money, which is usually the incumbent. That wasn’t always the case though.  In 2007, Dawn Zimmer lost her election to City Council in a four-way race to a long-time incumbent, but won head-to-head in a runoff.  Without a runoff, Dawn Zimmer would never have sat on the City Council...she would have lost in the winner-take-all scenario we have today.  A similar outcome also just occurred in the 2017 Jersey City Downtown Ward E runoff where the candidate backed by the establishment won in the general election, but lost to an upstart in the runoff. So, in trying to block runoffs, Mayor Bhalla is essentially limiting the viability for independents to run for political office in favor of himself and candidates that he supports.  

Reinstating runoffs allows local candidates a chance to make their case on municipal issues without having them distracted by the polarizing partisan politics found at the state and national levels. I believe that we need to continue to challenge the status quo to ensure that new energy and new ideas are encouraged and elevated by Hoboken's electoral process, not thwarted by establishment politicians.

Keep in mind, Mayor Bhalla was not supported by 68% of voters, earning less than 1/3 of votes. Runoffs would return majority rule, and his opposition to runoffs calls into question his ability to actually win a majority vote. It is further disappointing to see Mayor Bhalla spreading misinformation and half-truths to make his point.  

The Mayor has cited reduced voter turnout in the last Jersey City runoff where the mayoral candidate wasn't even in the runoff and fails to mention that the last time Hoboken held a runoff election for Mayor in 2009 turnout actually increased from the general election. Meanwhile, he suggests that he supports an instant runoff system that, while certainly worth exploring, is not currently allowable by state law and even if permitted, likely won't roll out before the next mayoral election. The mayor references “massive vote-buying” which although has significantly decreased over the years, is still sadly an issue but not unique to runoffs. Perhaps our mayor’s energies are best spent suppressing the referenced vote buying, not stopping the people’s right to decide whether or not they want a runoff election. Think about it, should we blame the voting process for Russian meddling, or should we aim to end Russian meddling?  

Sadly, all of this is meant to distract from the fact that Mayor Bhalla is concerned that re-instituting runoff elections would hurt his own chances of re-election as he has not demonstrated the ability to secure majority support or to work collaboratively with his fellow elected officials.  This is a deeply cynical ploy that puts politics over our city's values of transparency and openness.

The Question As To How Our Elections Are Run Is Now With You! Vote Yes On Local Question #1 To Bring Back Runoffs.


FAQ ON RUNOFF ELECTIONS



  • RUNOFF ELECTIONS CAN CHANGE THE FINAL OUTCOME…AND FAVOR INDEPENDENTS

    Some have contested that there is no change in the outcome of an election, however the election of Dawn Zimmer to Council upends that. In 2007 Zimmer ran in a four-way race, and came in second in the general but won the runoff. Just this year, James Solomon in Jersey City’s Ward E came in second in the 5-way Council race, and won the runoff. The same occurred with Reed Gusciora in Trenton, who ran in a 6-way Mayoral race, coming in second in the general but winning the runoff. When fractured voters have to decide between two candidates, the majority of total voters has been known to shift the course of an election. That’s democracy!  

  • VOTER TURNOUT HAS HISTORICALLY INCREASED FROM A MUNICIPAL TO A RUNOFF ELECTION.

    The last time Hoboken held a runoff election for mayor, in 2009, turnout increased from the general election. Mayor Bhalla's claim that voter turnout is reduced is not based in any recent fact and completely opposite of what we have historically seen in Hoboken (take a look at the reference chart)

    Further, using voter turnout from Jersey City's 2017 December runoff to show reduced turnout is not an acceptable baseline for making that argument. In that particular election, Jersey City's Mayor, Steve Fulop, won on the first ballot with 77 percent of the vote, as did 5 of 9 Council candidates and none of their names were on the runoff ballot.  As such, it's logical to see how overall voter turnout decreased proportionally when there weren't as many races left to decide.

  • THE COST OF A RUNOFF IS NOT $140k

    It has been suggested by some that the additional cost of the runoff is $140,000, without explanation of where this number came from.  Looking back, it appears to reflect the number that was used in 2012 for the savings relating to moving our municipal elections from May to November and eliminating the runoffs. The City Clerk has estimated that a runoff election would cost the City around $10,000.  For the ten positions (1 mayor and 9 council members) that oversee a $117,000,000 budget, don’t you want to make sure you elect the right people?

     

  • IF A RUNOFF IS NEEDED, IT WOULD BE IN DECEMBER, BUT NOT DURING THE “HOLIDAY SEASON”.  

    Pursuant with NJ State law, if a runoff is needed, “the run-off election shall be held at a special election on the subsequent Tuesday next after the first Monday in December”. Also keep in mind, if a candidate earns over 50 percent of the vote on Election Day, no runoff would be required.  

  • INSTANT RUNOFF / RANKED CHOICE VOTING IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW AND WONT BE FOR OUR NEXT ELECTION.  

    Last January, the Hoboken City Council  unanimously approved a resolution urging the state legislature to consider passing law to allow municipalities to adopt instant runoff elections. If and when the state does permit ranked choice voting, Hudson County would still need to source new software and voting machines, implement new voting processes and policies, train election workers and educate voters on the new voting system.  Even supposing that instant runoffs were approved by the state legislature this year, they would not be fully implemented in time for our next Council election in 2019 or mayoral election in 2021.

  • ILLEGAL VOTES ARE MORE OF A PROBLEM IN A CROWDED GENERAL ELECTION THAN IN A RUNOFF.  

    All elections are sadly targets for vote buying, but runoffs make it harder for the illegal practice to be successful.  In a runoff it would require thousands of bought votes, in two elections. In a crowded general, it would perhaps require only a few hundred, once.  The smaller voting blocks that multiple-candidate general elections create make vote buying far more possible while runoffs dilute that.

CAN HOBOKEN BE MISLED?

Since I first challenged a long-time incumbent and ran for City Council three years ago, you've always known me as someone who’s willing to stand up against the patronage system and entrenched politicians that typify the political establishment in New Jersey.    

Which is why I am concerned with the direction Hoboken is headed politically. 

In June, Mayor Ravi Bhalla was censured by the NJ State Supreme Court for "unethical conduct" for failing to pay into his employee’s retirement account and being "nonchalant" about rectifying it for five years.  That’s not just wrong, it’s heartless.  In it's ruling, the Court opined that Bhalla had participated in “dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation,” yes....really.  This comes on the heels of another scandal Mayor Bhalla caused when he broke a campaign promise and took a second job at a politically connected law firm.  

And earlier this year, Hoboken paid $186k to settle two cases where Ravi Bhalla allegedly infringed on the first amendment rights of two residents who spoke out against him at City Council meetings.

But more recently, I uncovered that Hoboken taxpayers have unknowingly spent $10,000 over the past seven months funding the Mayor’s appeal of an ethics violation where he was reprimanded for voting on a business partner’s contract with the city.  The City's continued funding of his defense wouldn't be an issue if Ravi Bhalla hadn't lied to our city’s legal team, which directly led the city to enter into this folly in the first place. Instead of acknowledging his clear mistake, Mayor Bhalla instead has doubled down and ordered a city attorney to quietly defend him, without any transparency towards residents or the City Council.

In response, last Wednesday the City Council voted overwhelmingly (7-2) to terminate the contract with the law firm retained by the administration to stop this taxpayer ripoff. Yet again, instead of doing what’s right and accepting fault, the Mayor refused to enforce the resolution, setting the Council on a collision course with his administration that could have serious consequences.

How has our Mayor responded to these continued scandals? By lashing out at me for leading the charge to hold him accountable and trying to distract from his own problems by making false claims against me.

 

A DISTRACTION FROM THE ISSUES

To distract from the mounting controversy, this week a close friend of the mayor’s Chief of staff was sent to file a bogus ethics complaint against me.  They're saying that a long-awaited improvement to the city’s zoning that I am sponsoring along with Councilwoman Fisher is being done to benefit a campaign donor and developers. The truth is that this common sense measure would simply allow homeowners to add staircases to their backyards without dealing with an oppressive city bureaucracy. The Mayor would have you believe that this small change would be the end of the world, so he vetoed it, but nothing could be further from the truth.  This is something that the Zoning Board has urged the City Council to consider every year since 2012, and after half a decade of recommendations, it was approved by an overwhelming 7-2 vote. 

Updating our outdated zoning isn’t exactly a front-page issue, but it’s essential to keeping families in town and one of the main reasons I ran for City Council in the first place.   Read more about how out of date zoning hurts residents and forces them out of town.

The fact of the matter is that the donation was from a well-respected restaurateur in my district, not a developer or special interest as the mayor sensationalized and it had absolutely nothing to do with my decision to take up the zoning issue.  On the date of the contribution, the donor didn’t even own the property that he would later bring to the Planning Board.  As soon as I became aware that this donor was submitting an application, I recused myself from that meeting to avoid any appearance of a conflict. There is absolutely no merit to the mayor’s lies against me and worse, his attempt to defame a Hoboken-based small business for petty political gain.

Perhaps most telling, after concocting the story, Mayor Bhalla sent out a fake version of a news article to his supporters that intentionally removed crucial facts, such as editing the headline to change the meaning and mislead residents -- in doing so, trying to manipulate the local media to fit his own twisted and false narrative.
 

PUTTING POLICY FIRST  

Despite this political side-show, I remain dedicated to elevating good and rational policy-based ideas that help Hoboken and all residents.   The Mayor and his two allies on the Council are misrepresenting the goals and impacts of the proposed legislation and are attempting to turn a common sense policy decision to help homeowners into some kind of giveaway to developers.  For a spot-on analysis of what this ordinance actually aims to achieve, my colleague Councilwoman Tiffany Fisher has expertly broken it down and countered the mayor's false narrative.

Over the past two weeks, I have had the chance to listen to more community feedback on this issue and I plan to re-introduce revised legislation next month with additional assurances that limit this to the smaller, family-friendly, homes most negatively impacted by the city's flood ordinance.  Much like the original ordinance, the revised will continue to maintain the 60 percent principal lot coverage (30 percent rear yard) standard currently required by exisiting law, ensuring green space, light and air is preserved for all residents, while clarifying the code to allow them to safely access their backyards.  This is an opportunity to make a small but important change to the way our city treats homeowners, and I’m not backing down from it.

Ravi Bhalla might think that this political hit job, a gross misuse of his office and taxpayer resources, would silence me. He could not be more mistaken. He might also believe that he can scare Hoboken with wild accusations about donors and developers that don’t have a grain of truth to them. But I'm not going to stop fighting to hold his scandal-plagued administration accountable, or to keep moving our city forward. I know that Hoboken won’t fall for this kind of misdirection and that residents want the City Council to continue putting the needs of our city over the personal interests of the Mayor.